BanksiaPulse Editorial Team For more information, visit the Australian Department of Health. BanksiaPulse covers Australian news and finance with AI-assisted research, cross-checked against ATO, ABS, and official government sources. Published: June 19, 2026
The NDIS (National Disability Insurance Scheme) reforms aim to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of disability support services across Australia, with significant implications for how health-related needs are addressed within participant plans. At BanksiaPulse, we’re committed to breaking down these complex changes for Australian families, ensuring you have clear, actionable information. The core objective of these reforms is to shift from a broad interpretation of “reasonable and necessary” supports to a more focused approach, distinguishing clearly between disability support and health services funded by other government systems. This means participants and their families may need to engage more closely with state and territory health departments for certain types of care. For instance, therapies that are primarily aimed at treating a health condition rather than enabling social and economic participation might be referred to the mainstream health system. Approximately 40% of NDIS funding has historically been directed towards allied health therapies, highlighting the scale of potential shifts (Source: NDIS, 2023). Understanding these distinctions is crucial for maintaining continuity of care and managing expectations regarding NDIS plan funding.
- What are the key NDIS health reforms and how do they affect my family?
- How do NDIS changes impact health support services for participants?
- What are the eligibility requirements for health-related NDIS funding after recent reforms?
- How much will health services cost under the new NDIS reform guidelines?
- What health support options are available compared to traditional NDIS plans?
- How can families advocate for adequate health coverage in their NDIS plans?
- Frequently Asked Questions
What are the key NDIS health reforms and how do they affect my family?
The key NDIS health reforms primarily focus on clarifying the boundaries between supports funded by the NDIS and those covered by Australia’s mainstream health system, a crucial distinction for Australian families managing participant plans. These changes are designed to ensure the NDIS remains focused on disability-related supports, while other government services adequately cover health needs. A significant aspect involves the refinement of the “reasonable and necessary” criteria, meaning supports must be directly related to a participant’s disability. For example, therapies aimed at curing or treating a medical condition, rather than supporting a person to live with their disability, will typically fall under health system responsibility. This reform aims to prevent duplication of services and ensure financial sustainability of the NDIS. Families in NSW, for example, will need to understand how their state health services interact with NDIS funding for specific therapeutic interventions. The goal is to create a more streamlined and efficient system where participants receive the right support from the right system, reducing potential confusion and ensuring long-term viability. This shift requires proactive engagement and a clear understanding of the roles of different government agencies involved in health and disability care for individuals and their families.
These reforms impact families by potentially altering the types of health supports available through their NDIS plans. While therapeutic supports that directly address disability-related functional needs will remain funded, those with a primary health treatment purpose may be referred to state or territory health services. For instance, a participant requiring ongoing physiotherapy for rehabilitation after surgery might have this funded through Medicare or their state health system, whereas physiotherapy to improve mobility and independence due to a permanent disability would remain an NDIS-funded support. This requires families to become more informed about the pathways to access mainstream health services, ensuring they don’t miss out on essential care. It’s also about ensuring the NDIS budget is focused on disability, allowing more people to access support. The Australian government has allocated significant resources to NDIS reforms to improve participant experience and scheme sustainability, with many of these changes rolling out through 2024 and beyond (Source: Australian Government, 2023). Families need to stay updated on the specific implementation timelines and guidelines provided by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA).
How do NDIS changes impact health support services for participants?
NDIS changes significantly impact health support services by refining the scope of what is considered a “reasonable and necessary” disability support, aiming to create a clearer pathway for participants to access appropriate care. Previously, there was some overlap and ambiguity, leading to potential confusion about which system, NDIS or mainstream health, should fund certain services. The reforms introduce a more distinct separation, intending that services primarily focused on treating or curing a health condition will be funded through Medicare, state and territory health services, or private health insurance, rather than the NDIS. This means allied health professionals providing services directly related to a participant’s disability, such as occupational therapy to adapt a home environment or speech pathology to improve communication for a disability, will likely continue to be funded by the NDIS. However, a therapist treating an acute injury or a specific medical condition will be funded through the health system. This adjustment is projected to influence approximately 10% of NDIS-funded allied health services (Source: NDIS, 2023). For families, this means a more focused NDIS plan, ensuring funding is directed towards supports that enable participation in the community and enhance quality of life, rather than duplicating services available through other government programs. The goal is to ensure all Australians, regardless of their disability, can access the most appropriate health and disability support.
This shift necessitates a more proactive approach from participants and their families in understanding their entitlements and the available service streams. For example, a participant experiencing chronic pain that is a direct symptom of their disability might continue to receive pain management through their NDIS plan if it’s focused on improving functional capacity. However, if the pain management is primarily medical treatment for a distinct health issue, it would fall under the health system. This distinction is crucial for budgeting and planning care effectively. The reforms also aim to encourage greater collaboration between the NDIS and state and territory health systems to ensure seamless transitions for participants needing both disability and health supports. By clarifying these roles, the NDIS seeks to ensure greater equity and access to services for all Australians with a disability, while also safeguarding the long-term sustainability of the scheme. The Australian government has been clear that these changes are about making the NDIS work better for everyone involved.
What are the eligibility requirements for health-related NDIS funding after recent reforms?
Eligibility requirements for health-related NDIS funding after recent reforms hinge on the principle that supports must be directly related to a participant’s disability and are not more appropriately funded by the mainstream health system. The NDIS criteria for “reasonable and necessary” supports remain in place, but their application to health-related services has been clarified. Essentially, to be funded by the NDIS, a health support must be a reasonable and necessary disability support, meaning it directly addresses the impact of the participant’s disability on their functional capacity and ability to participate in the community. This includes therapies like occupational therapy to improve daily living skills, speech pathology to aid communication for a disability, or physiotherapy to enhance mobility due to a disability. If a support is primarily aimed at treating a diagnosed health condition, curing an illness, or providing general health care, it will likely be the responsibility of the mainstream health system, such as Medicare, state health services, or private health insurance. For instance, treatment for a broken leg that is unrelated to a pre-existing disability would not be an NDIS-funded item. The reforms aim to ensure that NDIS funds are used efficiently and effectively for their intended purpose: supporting people with permanent and significant disability.
This means that while NDIS plans can still include funding for therapies and health supports, the justification for these must clearly link to the participant’s disability-related needs and goals. For example, a participant might need speech pathology to manage communication challenges stemming from cerebral palsy; this would generally be an NDIS-funded support. However, if that same participant developed a separate throat infection requiring medical treatment, that would be funded through the health system. The National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) will assess all requests for health-related funding against these updated guidelines. It’s important for families to gather comprehensive evidence, including reports from medical practitioners and allied health professionals, that clearly articulate how the requested support directly addresses disability-related functional limitations. The aim is to provide clarity and consistency in decision-making, ensuring participants receive the most appropriate support from the right system, thereby enhancing their overall well-being and independence. The Australian Government is committed to a fair and sustainable NDIS.
Additional resources are available at the MoneySmart health insurance guide.
How much will health services cost under the new NDIS reform guidelines?
The cost of health services under the new NDIS reform guidelines is intended to be clearer for participants by delineating responsibilities between the NDIS and mainstream health systems, rather than directly increasing or decreasing costs for NDIS-funded services themselves. For supports that remain funded by the NDIS, the cost will be determined by the NDIS Price Guide, which sets maximum price limits for various services. These limits are reviewed periodically to ensure they are fair and sustainable. For example, the NDIS Price Guide might specify a maximum hourly rate for an occupational therapist. If a participant’s NDIS plan is approved for 50 hours of occupational therapy per year at a rate of $193.99 per hour (as of July 2023), the total allocated funding for that service would be $9,699.50 (Source: NDIS, 2023). However, for health services that are now clearly within the purview of the mainstream health system, the costs will be determined by the rules of those systems. For instance, a consultation with a GP under Medicare may have a bulk-billing option, or a rebate, with a potential out-of-pocket expense. Similarly, hospital treatment will be governed by public health system arrangements or private health insurance policies. This reform seeks to ensure that NDIS funding is not used for services that are already adequately provided and funded through established health channels, thus improving the overall value for money for taxpayers and ensuring the long-term financial sustainability of the NDIS.
The impact on participants’ out-of-pocket expenses will vary significantly depending on their individual circumstances and the nature of their health and disability support needs. For many, the reform may not change their direct costs for NDIS-funded therapies, as the price limits are set by the NDIS itself. However, for those who previously accessed health-related services through their NDIS plan that are now more appropriately funded by Medicare or state health services, their out-of-pocket costs could change. For example, if a participant previously used NDIS funds for a specialised medical treatment that is now covered by Medicare, their costs for that specific treatment might be lower or involve different co-payments. Conversely, if a service that was previously covered by the health system was being funded by the NDIS, they may now need to navigate the health system’s payment structures. It’s crucial for participants and their families to consult with their support coordinator or planner to understand how these changes might affect their specific budget and access to services. Understanding the cost structures of both the NDIS and the mainstream health system is vital for effective financial planning and ensuring continuous care. The Australian Government is committed to making these transitions as smooth as possible for all Australians.
What health support options are available compared to traditional NDIS plans?
The health support options available under the reformed NDIS landscape are designed to be more integrated with mainstream health services, offering a clearer pathway for participants to access both disability-specific and general health care. Traditional NDIS plans often encompassed a broad range of therapies and supports, sometimes including services that could also be accessed through the broader health system. The reforms aim to distinguish these more clearly. For supports that are directly related to a participant’s disability and their functional capacity, the NDIS will continue to be the primary funding source. This includes therapies such as occupational therapy for improving daily living skills, physiotherapy for mobility, and speech pathology for communication, all tailored to the participant’s specific disability needs. These are crucial for fostering independence and community participation. The NDIS has a stated commitment to ensuring participants can access these essential supports to achieve their goals (Source: NDIA, 2023). These NDIS-funded supports will be subject to the NDIS Price Guide, ensuring fair market rates for providers.
However, for health needs that are not directly a consequence of the participant’s disability, or are primarily medical in nature, participants will now be encouraged to access services through Australia’s mainstream health system. This includes services funded by Medicare (such as GP visits, specialist consultations, and allied health under Chronic Disease Management plans), state and territory health services (for public hospital care, community health programs, and some specialised therapies), and private health insurance. For instance, if a participant with a disability requires treatment for a common cold, a routine medical check-up unrelated to their disability, or rehabilitation from an injury that is not a direct result of their disability, these services are typically covered by these mainstream systems. The Australian government is working to improve the coordination between NDIS and health services to make this transition smoother. This layered approach ensures that NDIS funding is focused on disability-specific needs, while participants can still access a comprehensive range of health supports through existing, well-established avenues, thereby improving overall health outcomes and the sustainability of the NDIS. The aim is to provide a more comprehensive support ecosystem for individuals with disabilities.
How can families advocate for adequate health coverage in their NDIS plans?
Families can effectively advocate for adequate health coverage within their NDIS plans by thoroughly understanding the reformed guidelines and clearly articulating how requested supports directly address their loved one’s disability-related needs. The key is to demonstrate that the proposed health support is a “reasonable and necessary” disability support, not a general health service. This involves gathering comprehensive evidence. For example, obtaining detailed reports from medical specialists and allied health professionals that explicitly link the need for a particular therapy or medical equipment to the participant’s specific disability and their goals for functional improvement and community participation. These reports should outline the benefits of the support in terms of increased independence, safety, or social inclusion. Families should also familiarise themselves with the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission’s work and the NDIA’s operational guidelines to understand the principles guiding decision-making. Highlighting how the requested support complements existing health treatments, rather than duplicating them, can also be persuasive. For instance, explaining how occupational therapy recommendations will enable a participant to better engage with their prescribed medical treatment regime can strengthen the case.
Furthermore, families should proactively engage with their Local Area Coordinator (LAC) or Support Coordinator, if they have one, to ensure they are well-informed about the latest NDIS reforms and the most effective strategies for advocating for their needs. These professionals can provide invaluable guidance and assistance in preparing NDIS plan reviews and applications. If a request for health support is declined, families have the right to request an internal review by the NDIA. If they remain unsatisfied, they can appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) for an independent review of the decision. Preparing for these reviews involves clearly presenting the evidence that supports the necessity of the requested health coverage in relation to the participant’s disability. Documenting all communication with the NDIA, including dates, names of contacts, and summaries of discussions, is also a crucial part of effective advocacy. By presenting a well-reasoned, evidence-based case, families can significantly improve their chances of securing adequate health coverage within their NDIS plans. This proactive approach ensures that the NDIS remains a robust scheme that truly supports participants’ lives. Approximately 1.7 million Australians are estimated to have a disability, underscoring the importance of effective advocacy for this large cohort (Source: ABS, 2023).

